Wednesday 24 February 2021

Pistis reclaims a Blessing (weekending 27th February 2021)

 istis reclaims a blessing (weekending February 27th 2021)

In the anniversary week of the writing of the across-the-world-spreading Christian worship song ‘The Blessing’, istis ponders matters temporal and spiritual, secular and sacred…

The song (written by Chris Brown, Cody Carnes, Kari Jobe and Steven Furtick in late February 2020) began to ripple out from the US and across the globe following a service at Elevation Church, Ballantyne campus on March 1st 2020.[i]  In its first week there were apparently 12,000 downloads and 1.3m streamings. It has won the 2020 GMA Dove Awards for ‘Worship Recorded Song of the Year’ and has a Grammy Award nomination for ‘Best Christian Contemporary Music Performance Song’ 2021.

Within weeks the first of many nation-specific versions was recorded and now people in many countries[ii], churches and groups have their own version often with multiple voices brought together through technology that has come into its own hosting ‘virtual’ meetings, lessons, family gatherings and services:

And ‘Blessings’ now flood the world!    

But istis wonders whether there might be other versions to be written of this and also of many, many songs of worship; songs of faith; hymns, anthems, chorales and oratorios - rooted in and expressing a Christian tradition (and perhaps other faith traditions)?

What might it mean, for example, if there was a version of 'The Blessing' that went something like this:

We bless you and keep you.

May our face shine upon you and be gracious to you.

We turn our face toward you and give you peace.

Amen, amen, amen[iii]  

May our favor be upon you and a thousand generations, your family and your children and their children and their children. 

May our presence go before you and behind you and beside you, all around you and within you.

We are with you, we are with you.

In the morning, in the evening, in your coming and your going, in your weeping and rejoicing

We are for you, we are for you, we are for you…   

 

Changes minimal, but perhaps representing a significant shift in focus -

·        from: external, other, outside, exogenous, heavenly

·        to: here, us/we/you (singular or plural), endogenous, earthly.

And istis wonders whether there may be at least two routes to this re-framing:

 from a Christian/faith perspective emphasising a social gospel: “Christ has no body now but yours. No hands, no feet on earth but yours. Yours are the eyes through which he looks compassion on this world. Yours are the feet with which he walks to do good. Yours are the hands through which he blesses all the world. Yours are the hands, yours are the feet, yours are the eyes, you are his body. Christ has no body now on earth but yours.” St Theresa of Avila[iv]. And if you want your Christian Bible reference - possibly more Matthew 25 v 31-46 than John 3 v 16?

 from a sacred humanism or sacred world-ism or Mother Earth-ism or Gaia-ism perspective; where we together are perhaps enough; where we recognise that I and we is ‘us’, that we are responsible, we are connected, linked and co-dependent - sacredly webbed with all that lives and moves and has being, has life and breath and comprises ‘spaceship Earth’ in its unique extraordinariness and green-blue precious jewelness in a vast, vast universe?

Two routes, one destination?: “…do good: we will meet one another there.” Pope Francis (2013)[v]

And so, across the globe (wherever ‘The Blessing’ has been heard, covered or claimed - and also wherever it is yet to reach) what if we were really to bless each other, and turn our face to see every one and all, and do and be to every us and each other individually and collectively without exclusion...? And what if we were to play and sing and say:

·        “I/we bless you”

·        “I/we will keep you”

·        “I/we will be gracious to you”

·        “I/we will turn my/our face to you”

·        “I/we will give you peace”

·        “My/our favour will be upon you and your family across the generations”

·        “I/we will go before you and behind you and beside you, all around you - in the morning, in the evening, in your coming and your going, in your weeping and rejoicing”

·        “I am/we are for you…” 

… well, just imagine how different the world could be - here, now on earth whether or not that may also be as it is in heaven.

© Pistis                                                                                                                       

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog
entries to be found on Twitter: replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders 
   



[ii] Germany, Brazil, UK, an Haitian Creole version, a continent wide Latin America version, Zimbabwe (a favourite), the Hawaiian Islands, Malaysia, China, Tamil version, a Canadian churches version, Sweden, the Arab World version, versions in Aoterea (another favourite), Nigeria, South Africa, Ghana, India, Lebanon, the Greater Middle East version and on…   

[iii] So be it…  certainly, I verify, I agree, I concur…

Sunday 21 February 2021

Pistis reclaims minding our heads (weekending February 20th 2021)

 istis reclaims minding our heads (weekending February 20th 2021)

In a week when the UK Farm Safety Foundation[i] promotes its annual ‘Mind Your Head’ awareness campaign – (and neuroscientists and philosophers perhaps get ready to discuss the inclusion of both mind and head in a (non-Downing Street podium[ii]) three-part phrase which also perhaps somehow references a Descartesian sense of identity and being – possibly some overly-serious heavy lifting for just three words!), istis ponders emotional and psychological wellbeing…  

And with:

the World Health Organisation (WHO) recognising that: ‘Fear, worry, and stress are normal responses to perceived or real threats, and at times when we are faced with uncertainty or the unknown. So it is normal and understandable that people are experiencing fear in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Added to the fear of contracting the virus in a pandemic such as COVID-19 are the significant changes to our daily lives as our movements are restricted in support of efforts to contain and slow down the spread of the virus. Faced with new realities of working from home, temporary unemployment, home-schooling of children, and lack of physical contact with other family members, friends and colleagues, it is important that we look after our mental, as well as our physical, health.’[iii]

research exploring new areas of understanding about mind and body, the value of relations and relationships, about social and structural influences

a host of organisations: public, voluntary, charitable, campaigning, local, national and international offering support and resources - such as:

·        ‘Young Minds’(UK)[iv]

·        ‘Mind’ – for Better Mental Health[v] (UK)

·        The NHS[vi] 'every mind matters' (UK)

·        The Center for Disease Control (USA)[vii]

·        …and perhaps find, name and share details of helpful organisations wherever you may be…

But with a fear that the responses considered necessary may also be affecting other health services, including those for mental health[viii]

istis considers the challenges for policy and practice in complex debates about routes out, the cost or price of different constructs of wellbeing - perhaps playing out in ‘to lockdown or not to lockdown’ discussions.

istis also wonders whether the current situation perhaps, possibly, maybe provides an opportunity to reconsider whether psychological difficulties and distress could be a ‘normal reaction to abnormal events’ or ‘an abnormal reaction to normal events’ - with associated potential implications for how we might understand aetiology and problem loci, contributory factors and influences; vulnerability, resilience, ‘treatment’ and solution foci; potential links between mind, body and spirit in our individual and collective systems…

© Pistis                                                                                                                       

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog
entries to be found on Twitter: replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders 
 



[i] https://www.yellowwellies.org/farm-safety-foundation/ and see see Twitter’s @yellowwelliesuk and the video  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOvFT8-2xAs    See also ‘Tweets’ by @rebeccaOrr: our minds – perhaps the ‘Most undervalued, busy and powerful pieces of kit on any farm’

[iii] https://www.who.int/teams/mental-health-and-substance-use/covid-19 and with no apology for a lengthy quotation!


Sunday 14 February 2021

Pistis reclaims rhetoric (weekending February 13th 2021)

 

istis reclaims rhetoric (weekending February 13th  2021)

‽istis, ponders the art of ‘making a case’ and wonders (somewhat existentially - with ‘skin in the game’, as cousins across the pond might say - given the apparent meaning/s of pistis[i]) whether there was ever a time when

·        the power of argument, the deployment of loaos (stats, facts, authoritative statements); pathos (appeals based on emotion, sympathy, pity, anger); ethos (a speaker and their words having intrinsic credibility and weight); kairos (timeliness, the time has come for a particular idea or action)[ii]

·        persuasion or the winning over of minds and (Valentine’s Day) hearts

…ever really prevailed and led the process, decisions and judgements in the courts of civil, criminal, governmental, senatorial or natural ‘law’…?

But perhaps this week we have indeed heard and seen the use of various rhetorical devices[iii]:

‽ cacophony: a combination of sounds to create a displeasing effect?

humour: used to increase the ‘likelihood of agreement; used to deflate counter-arguments; to induce ridicule through ridiculousnessing[iv]?

anaphora: ‘I have a dream’; ‘Stop the steal’? –other contrasting examples are probably available?

hyperbole: UK government’s ‘world beating’; ‘the greatest witch hunt in the history of our country’[v]?

apophasis: bringing up a subject by denying that the subject should be brought up

entrepisms: points in the form of a list

hypophora: posing a question and then immediately supplying the answer (Is  hypophora a useful rhetorical device? Yes…  Am I going to explain it further? No…)

expedito: providing a series of possibilities – explaining why just one is possible

But after the talk, the presentation of film clips (and their sometime cacophonous compilation) - the rhetoric meets burdens of proof, reality not mythology: ‘on the balance of probabilities’ (UK civil courts); ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ (in UK criminal courts) and, in a US senatorial court?, well who knows - for that is perhaps, possibly, maybe between the jurors and their political affiliations, their ‘base’, their weighing up of future prospects and, of course their ‘good faith’ and conscience…  

© Pistis                                                                                                                       

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog
entries to be found on Twitter: replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders 
 



[i] See, for example: Pistis – considered to be one of the good spirits to escape Pandora’s box; the mythological personification perhaps of trust, honesty, reliability and good faith; whose ‘opposite numbers’ were called Apate (deception) and Pseudologoi (lies); whose peers were called Fides (faith), Pietas (piety)  (www.theoi.com/Daimon/Pistis.html); who influenced possibly alongside elpis (hope), sophrosyne (prudence) and the charites/graces (charm, beauty, nature, human creativity, goodwill, fertility); Pistis, which maybe in rhetoric sought to induce true judgement through enthymematic argument – words and perhaps pictures - in modes such as: a subject matter capable of inducing a state of mind within the audience (affect?), the subject itself appealing to the intellect (cognition?) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistis)  – influencing behaviour?; whose Greek origins (pre-Christian reductive appropriation?) embraced persuasive discourse concentrating on affect and effect; who perhaps, possibly, maybe championed persuasion and argument as a whole process…?; NB: I’m sure that there is little doubt that other views and better summaries and information are available…     

[iii] Op cit

[iv] Pistis is pretty sure that this is not a word… until now


Friday 5 February 2021

Pistis (re)claims 'sufficientism' (weekending February 6th 2021)

 

istis (re)claims sufficientism (weekending February 6th 2021)

‽istis, with considerable trepidation and perhaps the naïvety of middle-age and theoretical and practical ignorance and inexperience in the particular field – and thus with apologies - ponders some of the apparent workings of ‘capitalism’ in a week when we are told that:

·        the ‘real time worth’ of a single individual, the outgoing[i] CEO of a company, is $195.4billion[ii] (Forbes 5.2.2021)

·        in the UK apparently 900 consultants have received c. £1,000 a day to help build a £22billion ‘national public service’[iii]

·        globally, 700 million people, 10 percent of the world’s population live on less than $1.90 a day (the World Bank’s international line for extreme poverty) and a third of the entire urban population is living in a slum (unsafe or unhealthy homes in a crowded city)…

Suspecting that it is unlikely to be this simple, ‽istis nevertheless wonders about perhaps two key elements of ‘capitalism’:

·        making profit: sales over production costs - with the difference possibly representing exploitation somewhere along the line in some cases: charge to the buyer linked to demand (need or perceived want)?; squeeze to the contributors to production (suppliers or workers)?

·        the distribution of profit: re-investment and development?; to shareholders (reward for financial risk?); to employees (a small number?) in bonuses above salary?

And ‽istis catches a glimpse of some ideas amidst the extraordinary numbers and the mysteries of economic theory:

 ‘sufficientism’: where everyone has enough

 a hierarchy of rights: where my right to wealth, leisure, all things ‘extra’ cannot be claimed or demanded or guaranteed until everyone’s fundamental right to life is assured

and, in a week when ‘vaccine nationalism’ is discussed (with apparently the UK - population of c. 68 million souls[iv] - currently having placed orders for 407m doses of vaccines produced by seven different companies[v]) and the principle in a connected world that ‘no-one is safe until everyone is safe’ perhaps seems rather forgotten - a phrase wafts on the breeze: ‘from each according to their ability, to each according to their need’. 

Ridiculous, ridiculous…  for surely it is necessary for inequality to flourish; for competition to thrive and drive the market; for private to profit; for exploitation to oil the machine? But perhaps, possibly, maybe - just for a moment - imagine what a world might look like where everyone at least has sufficient…    

© Pistis                                                                                                                       

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog
entries to be found on Twitter: replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders 
 


‽istis ponders volunteering, expertise and tapping (weekending April 27th 2024)

  ‽istis ponders volunteering, expertise and knowing where and how to tap (weekending April 27 th  2024) Various themes this weekending; m...