Saturday 27 January 2024

Pistis ponders national service (weekending January 27th 2024)

 

‽istis ponders national service (weekending January 27th 2024)

So, this week in the UK a discussion has re-emerged about the possibility and potential desirability of some form of ‘national service’ for young adults.

This time it seems to have been triggered not so much by a concern at the behaviour of a very small minority of disaffected and ‘deviant’ or ‘feral’ young people, or an answer to the perceived lack of ‘backbone’ of a ‘snowflake’ generation[i] - but by concern that recruitment to the armed services is down[ii] and fear that the type of warfare so apparently dismissed in November 2021 by one-time Prime Minister, Boris Johnson (“the old concepts of fighting big tank battles on the European landmass … are over”[iii]) may be a dreadful feature of the future.

Various models have been discussed in the media and ‽istis has done a bit of searching.

One source ‽istis came across was the ‘Rwanda Basic Education Board’[iv] and an eLearning ‘History’ module. National service is defined and described including some consideration of what seems to be a basic distinction between ‘civil’ and ‘armed’ service:

‘It is one way to integrate the youth in national priorities and their contribution into national social and economic development. Many countries have adopted the national service for different purposes. Some of them are inspired by the need of increasing the number of soldiers during the war time. This is a case of national service in United Kingdom and in Singapore for example. Other countries like Ghana, Nigeria and Brazil, the motives which have guided option for national service including the need to incorporate the youth into social and economic development of their countries. In Rwanda, the adoption of national service was inspired by the concept of volunteerism practiced in traditional Rwanda.’

Another source of information is the ‘World Population Review’[v] website which provides information about different ways to recruit to the military and lists countries with mandatory military services – totalling 86 (with some caveats, e.g: the United States military has been all-volunteer since 1973 but an act of Congress could still reinstate the draft in case of a national emergency; China where it is reported that conscription of males aged 18-22 for 24 months service is legal but has never been needed[vi]). Some countries where it is compulsory seem to have effectively militarised pretty much the whole population.

‽istis wonders whether the proposed solution of ‘national service’ is in danger of being a compounding the problem – an acceptance that military responses will be needed; a distraction from other possible solutions.

The primary source of information on non-military national service turned out to be Wikipedia and information under the heading: ‘Alternative civilian service’. The word ‘alternative’ is significant as it seems to be an option for conscripted persons who are conscientious objectors. 11 countries and schemes are listed.

But ‽istis wonders what sort of society we might create if a national service initiative was indeed considered necessary, but that we devised it to help build the sort of world that perhaps we would like, rather than to meet the worst examples of the world that we have already created, or a future world we fear.

Instead of teaching young people to shoot and march and kill and learn secondary skills because they help with the optimal achievement of those fighting ends when the state needs a killing capability (always offensive, even when defensive?) – perhaps we could we still teach many of the secondary skills (engineering and construction; communication and logistics; teamwork, people and resource management; first aid, medicine and nursing; driving, catering, even playing musical instruments, kit-organising and bed-making etc., etc.) in order to equip people for meeting the living needs of individuals and groups and society; training for jobs for life, rather than training for jobs for death?

Maybe we could even call the national service personnel ‘apprentices’ and remunerate them… But, hang on, would that really be ‘national service’ or, rather more, a well-developed and resourced programme of post-school education and training[vii]

Sign us up…  perhaps throw in some lessons in histories and cultural appreciation; tolerance, respect, equality and inclusion; self- and other-respect; law, rights, duties and responsibilities; diplomacy; promoting inclusive and participative approaches etc., and that might just perhaps, possibly help move us beyond a divided and parcelled up world of constructed and imposed national and state boundaries and war into something more universal, just and peaceful.

For those of us who consider ourselves to be unashamed global/world citizens and humanitarians, it could even start to sound like part of a solution.

©‽istis

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog entries to be found on X/Twitter with replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders.

X/Twitter ‘follows’ and respectful comment and dialogue welcome...  



[i] Though some have also recently suggested that the pejorative epithet ‘snowflake’ may not only applicable to a particular ‘modern’ generation:  https://www.thepoke.com/2024/01/18/lee-anderson-reverse-ferreted-over-rwanda-because-labour-mps-were-laughing-at-him-17-funniest-responses/2/

[iii] Many references including: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/06/traditional-heavy-warfare-has-returned-to-europe-with-ukraine-conflict and it seems that the multi-sacked Johnson has volunteered to sign up (potentially); not sure that it will be very rewarding career, mind - can a 'Johnson' ever rise above the rank of privates? (slang not necessarily used unintentionally... I know, not very funny, not very clever!) & https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1572041/boris-johnson-russia-ukraine-tank-war-europe-invasion-putin-tobias-ellwood-spt

[iv] eLearning courses: History, Advanced Level Senior 6, Unit 8: https://elearning.reb.rw/course/view.php?id=538&section=8

[vi] Also for some countries information is not necessarily up-to-date or limited.

[vii] Including for SPADs (Special Political ADvisers) and very young members of the House of Lords, ennobled for goodness knows what… 


Friday 19 January 2024

Pistis ponders baking, again (weekending January 20th 2024)

 

‽istis ponders baking, again (weekending January 20th 2024)

This weekending ‽istis is baking for a ‘now it’s Christmas Day’ family celebration postponed by ‘Covid’ which proved (pun intended) - with gratitude at being spared and memories of the fear and the strangeness of those times less than four years ago – temporarily incapacitating, not fatal…  

Recipe: This one, from the internet - source of information limitless?, available at the tapping of keys and amazing processes triggered; work of human hand, work of hidden hand[i] and seemingly supernatural algorithms driving search engines; no reason not to trust – seems right, looks do-able, endorsed and liked. Others: in print with or without pictures for comparison; on the shelf; bought, given or inherited. Others still: handed down; tried and tested, tweaked and amended; bespoked for occasion, for particular needs or wants -  perhaps across generations.

Ingredients: have I got what I need and in sufficient quantity?; check what’s in the cupboard, new and unopened or left over from previous use. Others, on a shopping list, a wish list; means and wherewithal (shop, supply chain, manufacture, work of human hand, work of hidden hand) dependent. Alternatives acceptable?

Equipment: yet again, have I got what I need? including space and time, tools and utensils, power and the heat it generates.

Process: what, when and how?; steps and method; preparation; measuring and checking; mixing and combining; waiting perhaps for proving; trusting that the chemistry will happen in the heat of the oven, for as long as it takes.  

    Et voilĂ , as they say‽ Cake!

They also say: ‘the proof of the pudding is in the eating’; we shall see…

Perhaps later, as the product is tested and the outcome evaluated (possibly measured in smiles or frowns, in the immediate taste or what is left as a lingering legacy - bitter, sour or sweet) ‽istis may wonder whether any of this could serve as a metaphor? For what else might we need a recipe, ingredients, equipment, a process and proof this weekending…‽

Bake![ii]

 

 ©‽istis

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog entries to be found on X/Twitter with replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders.

X/Twitter ‘follows’ and respectful comment and dialogue welcome...  



[i] After Adam Smith ‘The Wealth of Nations’ and an earlier reference in ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments’

[ii] As uttered at least three times to start the challenges in probably all the ‘Great British Bake Off’ shows on British TV in recent years.


Friday 12 January 2024

Pistis ponders power (weekending January 13th 2024)

 

‽istis ponders power (weekending January 13th 2024)

This weekending ‽istis wonders again about power.

Previous wonderings and ponderings have focused on political, social, imperial, state and nation, economic power and the power-ful, but a link to an article from ‘X’ sparked (pun intended) an interest not in these forms of power nor of power and energy derived from nuclear fission (though the Paul Whitehouse and Bob Mortimer’s UK ‘Gone Hogmanay Fishing’[i] was another gem, ‽istis reckons!) but from nuclear fusion: ‘the process that takes place in the heart of stars and provides the power that drives the universe.’[ii]

The article led with this claim: ‘Magnetic confinement fusion has had its Wright Brothers moment. Find out why it could be game-changing for the energy sector’.[iii]

What is the ‘game-changing' development? Well not something new that occurred this week but, in December 2022, US government scientists at the National Ignition Facility at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California apparently achieved a ‘net energy gain in a fusion reaction’, i.e: the experiment’s process produced more energy than that taken to generate it.

Francesca Ferrazza, Head of Magnetic Fusion Initiatives at the Italian energy company Eni, is quoted: “Fusion could be a real game-changer in the energy field.” “According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, fusion could generate approximately four million times more energy per kilogram of fuel than burning coal. This can make fusion a crucial element for the decarbonisation of the energy sector.”

Another interesting source of information (in this brief foray into the issue) is the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)[iv] and an article by Matteo Barbarino (from the agency’s Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications). The basic physics is explained - and claims are made: ‘…if nuclear fusion can be replicated on earth at an industrial scale, it could provide virtually limitless clean, safe and affordable energy to meet the world’s demand.’ A few grammes of key materials (deuterium inexpensively derived from seawater, tritium derived from ‘naturally abundant’ lithium) can apparently generate a terajoule (and ‽istis has learnt that any quantity that starts with tera- tends to be a big amount!) of energy, the suggested equivalent energy one person in a ‘developed’ country typically uses over 60 years (is this a helpful figure‽).

Apparently, words such as ‘safe’ and ‘clean’ can be used with confidence (no nuclear waste, no risk of runaway reactions or a meltdown, no carbon dioxide or other harmful ‘greenhouse’ gases released into the atmosphere).

Research – seemingly co-operative and collaborative (!) – is underway in more than 50 countries and such global partnerships and collaboration (to mobilise and co-ordinate resources) is one of the factors considered necessary for successful further development and ‘roll out’.

The IAEA suggests that another important requirement is the development of necessary non-material infrastructure – including industry standards and good practice.

Well, all very interesting, exciting and positive – thinks ‽istis… but perhaps there are some questions that possibly, maybe link the topic of generating near limitless, clean and safe electrical energy ‘power’ with the other forms of power referred to in the first few lines, above:

·         Who will own the means of production?

·         Who will own the means of provision and distribution?

·         Who will own the means of persuasion, influence, decision-making, regulation and governance?

Ownership, control, profit, availability and access… and we seem to still be in the territory of social stratification, inclusion and exclusion, inequality of benefit, lives with greater comfort and opportunity alongside and systemically connected to lives with greater desperation and with such lesser comfort and opportunity… and what about all those ‘things’ that will be more cleanly, safely and cheaply powered (and the question of ownership of the means of production, provision and persuasion can be extended perhaps to all the ‘things’)...  and what if they turn out to be weapons and tasers and water cannons and uniforms, and bricks for prisons and walls and barriers and checkpoints…‽

So if the fusion genie in practice as well as theory now has sufficient net energy gain to begin to clamber out of the bottle, perhaps the final set of questions that ‽istis is left pondering this weekending is:

·         what could I, or you, or they, or (just perhaps, possibly, maybe an all-embracing) ‘we’ do with such energy, such power‽ 

·         could and would it be used any more for good or ill than how I, or you, or they, or we use power and energy already‽

…and what might be the consequences‽

 ©‽istis

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog entries to be found on X/Twitter with replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders.

X/Twitter ‘follows’ and respectful comment and dialogue welcome...  


Thursday 4 January 2024

Pistis ponders jokes (weekending January 6th 2024)

 

‽istis ponders jokes (weekending January 6th 2024)

This weekending,

·         as the echo of pulled Christmas crackers - and the groans at the jokes many of them contain - fade

·         as Epiphany looms and some may ask: ‘Three Wise Men? You must be joking!’

·         as the tongue-twisting words of a song in a pantomime are chosen to trip an audience into laughter: ‘One smart fella, he felt smart…’[i] etc.

·         as the current Home Secretary proves that you can hold (and continue to hold) one of the so-called ‘great offices of state’ in the UK without apparently being too cleverly[ii] or at all funny - 'joking' about giving his wife '“a little bit of Rohypnol in her drink every night” which was “not really illegal if it’s only a little bit”. Mr Cleverly also laughed that the secret to a long marriage was ensuring your spouse was “someone who is always mildly sedated so she can never realise there are better men out there.”' (according to The Mirror newspaper: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/james-cleverly-joked-giving-wife-31741719) 

·         as Ricky Gervais and Dave Chappelle hit the news with controversial ‘comedy’ specials[iii] that may be ‘funny or foul’[iv], near the mark, defining the line for us, opening up dialogue, proving comedy to be a great equaliser, just a cheap shot, engaging in school-playground antics, edgy, transgressive, progressive, regressive or digressive, exercising a form of activism, wasting bandwidth, being a free speech activist, etc?...

‽istis ponders humour, what is a joke, what is funny, should there be ‘a line’, where do you draw the line and wonders again[v] whether there is any place for the phrase: ‘just because you can doesn’t mean that you should’? Oh, and when and why might an apology be issued?

Here are some of the words of that ‘great state office holder’ James Cleverly doing the rounds of breakfast news programmes this week:

‘It was meant to be a joke and I completely accept that it was hurtful for a number of people which is why I apologised when asked about it – and that apology was heartfelt.’ (BBC Breakfast 2.1.2024)

‘There are things that people say in private they would hope remain private and we all perhaps say things in private that we wouldn’t want or choose not to say publicly.’ (Good Morning Britian 2.1.2024)

And then what could be described as a ‘politicians’ apology’ was also added: ‘I’m frustrated that the conversation has been deflected by the words that I’ve said and that’s why I apologised.’ (also GMB 2.1.2024)[vi]

‽istis understands the free-speech, no holds barred, the joke is on you for laughing at what I’ve said, I was being ironic arguments – and even the ‘no publicity is bad publicity’ fall back - but wonders whether there might be a couple of simple guiding principles that more comedians, politicians, laughers, smirkers and guffawers and, indeed, any of us could follow (whether in public or private, whether recorded, reported or lost in the passing of the moment) – summed up as:

·         If someone can say of the topic or experience: ‘that was/is no joke’ - then perhaps it should not be the subject of a joke?

·         If someone can say ‘that was/isn’t funny’ - then perhaps it isn’t?

Some comedians and those aspiring to shining wittery[vii] (in the office, in the workplace including Downing Street and other great offices, or at home) might have to work that bit harder to make us laugh - but how much kinder and tolerant and safe might we all be, especially those for whom their experiences are no joke and not funny?

©istis                                                                                                                    

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog entries to be found on X/Twitter: replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders. X/Twitter ‘follows’ and respectful comment and dialogue welcome...  



[i] As included in the High Wycombe panto.  Also: well played Aunty June in this clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiS6EteKcoY (other versions are available)

[ii] Oh the perils of the notion of nominative determinism; I’m not sure that I would want to be driven home by you James, with or without the horses being spared! Mind you, have you been listening to the UK’s Covid Inquiry coverage and the levels of professionalism, courtesy, respect, and honour on display (not least on screen and from extracts from ‘WhatsApp’ messages, many an HR department in many an organisation would have been working overtime)…? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Offices_of_State#:~:text=They%20are%20the%20prime%20minister,offices%20excluding%20the%20prime%20minister & https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/

[iv] For a discussion you might like to look at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba7tY6AJYuI (PS: for what it’s worth, I’m with Paula Rhone-Adrien)

[v] A question considered in a blog from February last year:  https://pistisrec.blogspot.com/2023/02/pistis-ponders-just-because-you-could.html

[vi] Another ‘politician’s apology’ perhaps goes something along the lines of: ‘I’m sorry if anyone was offended by what I said…  that was not my intention…’ with the ‘my remarks were taken out of context’ option also available to be deployed perhaps by the more aggrieved (e.g: those who had actually resigned or had been stood down).

[vii] Now that might make the basis of a good panto song?


‽istis ponders volunteering, expertise and tapping (weekending April 27th 2024)

  ‽istis ponders volunteering, expertise and knowing where and how to tap (weekending April 27 th  2024) Various themes this weekending; m...