Friday 23 June 2023

Pistis ponders tragedies and tipping points (weekending June 24th 2023)

 

istis ponders tragedies, catastrophic implosions, heeding warnings - and tipping points (weekending June 24th 2023)

istis likes to reference a variety of sources for news and information, but was struck by the ‘Top stories’ page on the ‘Guardian Editions UK Daily’ as the ending of this week approaches (Friday, June 23rd’s edition).

Next to each other are three stories that take us from UK domestic matters - to a story that some might say has disproportionately dominated headlines - and on to an international/global story with potential existential implications for everyone and everything:

·        Economy: Recession fears as inflation forces Bank to raise rates to 15-year high (largest feature/picture)

·        Titanic sub incident: Crew believed to have died in ‘catastrophic implosion’ (smaller feature/picture)

·        Environment: Ecological tipping points could occur much sooner than expected, study finds (smallest feature/picture – and font size!)

Leaving aside perhaps rather crass potential associations of the phrase ‘catastrophic implosion’ with the Tory Party or the Church of England’s reputation for managing safeguarding matters[i] - there seems to be much to ponder in all of this…

Not least the relative coverage and, perhaps, levels of response to incidents and desperate tragedies in/on the sea if comparisons are made[ii] between the international search and rescue/recovery operation for a submersible with five people on board – v – the response to the sinking of a boat last week overloaded with people seeking what they saw as a better, safer life, “one of the biggest tragedies in the Mediterranean” and tens maybe hundreds of people died…

So as the week ends, istis has been wondering mainly about dangers and hazards; warnings – heeded and unheeded; ‘accidents’ that perhaps could be renamed ‘reasonable preventables’; risk assessment and management; mitigations and reassurances; hubris and unlearned or forgotten memories of events more than a hundred years' ago (iii); elusive foresight and the seemingly ever-'wonderful thing': hindsight…

These are themes that istis has indeed pondered before[iv] and, on reflection, they have been a major longstanding focus, not least in past professional life.

There is also maybe a link to the ponderings of a few weeks’ ago if we find ourselves identifying with Schrödinger’s cat[v] living in circumstances where various outcomes are all possible, all 'true'. It may be just far too complex to make an informed decision about how to act - even if we believe that we could individually make a difference…?

So, with all these issues teeming round and around, three questions especially continue to prevail for istis right now at the point of typing:

·        Who or what do we look to for any reassurance in the face of hazards and dangers?

o   despite cost of living and interest rate increases in the UK including the likely impact on housing costs (especially mortgages[vi]) did people across the nation sleep a little more easily when they heard the UK’s Prime Minister say: ”I’m here to tell you that I am totally one hundred per cent on it and it is going to be OK and we are going to get through this…   and that is the most important thing that I wanted to let you know today.” (So that’s alright then, especially as the message was delivered in a warehouse and with just a hint of softened, person-of-the-people, glottlestopped ‘t’s  - thank goodness Mr Sunak is “on i(t)”… though istis does worry that the PM seems to have no ‘%’ left for anything else!)

 

·        How do we make sense of the idea of potentially elusive but absolutely critical ‘tipping points’ – from which there may be no turning back?

o   the point at which carbon fibre might fail[vii]

o   the point at which stress because of living conditions in one’s home country makes leaving and a perilous sea crossing seem a better option

o   the point at which someone’s anxiety about their financial situation and their continuing ability to provide for their family becomes utterly, utterly overwhelming[viii]

o   the point at which the environment, the ecology, our planet, our all-of-life support system breaks down catastrophically with ‘more than a fifth of ecosystems worldwide, including the Amazon rainforest, (are) at risk of a catastrophic breakdown within a human lifetime’; where one ‘driver of destruction’, such as climate change or deforestation combines ‘with other threats, such as water stress, degradation and river pollution from mining’ and ‘the breakdown comes much quicker.’[ix]

o   the point at which we leave inertia, uncertainty, apathy or hubris aside and heed warnings so that ‘hindsight’ might no longer be described as ‘a wonderful thing’. A passage from the report ‘Earlier collapse of Anthropocene ecosystems driven by multiple faster and noisier drivers’ by Simon Willcock, Gregory S. Cooper, John Addy & John A. Dearing referred to and published this week perhaps demands to be cited in full:

‘For many observers, UK Chief Scientist John Beddington’s argument that the world faced a ‘perfect storm’ of global events by 2030 has now become a prescient warning. Recent mention of ‘ghastly futures’, ‘widespread ecosystem collapse’ and ‘domino effects on sustainability goals’ tap into a growing consensus within some scientific communities that the Earth is rapidly destabilizing through ‘cascades of collapse’. Some even speculate on ‘end-of-world’ scenarios involving transgressing planetary boundaries (climate, freshwater and ocean acidification), accelerating reinforcing (positive) feedback mechanisms and multiplicative stresses.’

    And finally, istis wonders:  

·        How do we live and behave and think and feel in a world where perhaps in so many respects, possibly for so many of us, most things are OK and we will get through it – until maybe suddenly they are not, and we don’t…

 

©istis                                                                                                                    

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog entries to be found on Twitter: replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders. Twitter ‘follows’ and respectful comment and dialogue welcome...  



[ii] Many references including: https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/story-behind-packed-migrant-boat-exposes-ugly-truth-in-missing-sub-crisis/news-story/476b2ffa738a81e830e2f5a75d5f7d96 & https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/syria-migrants-boat-sinking-titanic-submersive-missing-rcna90336

[iii] https://www.newsweek.com/james-cameron-says-arrogance-hubris-doomed-both-titanic-titan-1808574  

[iv] Dangers and hazards, risk assessment and decision-making, in a pandemic-related blog from May ‘20: https://pistisrec.blogspot.com/2020/05/pistis-seeks-to-avoid-then-miracle.html & https://pistisrec.blogspot.com/2021/12/pistis-wonders-influences-weekending.html Including the sentence: ‘low probability events can nevertheless sometimes occur; that the holes in a many-layered ‘Swiss Cheese’ model of risk assessment may yet line up however improbable it seems; that there may be gaps in the tightest of safety nets woven with the most robust warped and wefted threads…’

[vi] This feature on the Bank of England website in Jan 2023 seems helpful, though not necessarily reassuring https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/bank-overground/2023/how-are-the-rising-cost-of-living-and-interest-rates-affecting-households


Friday 16 June 2023

Pistis (re)ponders music (weekending June 17th 2023)

 


And repeat :II istis (re)ponders music in the hope of light relief? (weekending June 17th 2023)

Somewhat spoilt for choice this weekending. Many topics jostled for attention and the top spot for this edition of istis’ ‘weekly blog on contemporary topics - offered in good faith because just perhaps, possibly, maybe things could be different...’:

·        significant events in the UK’s parliament bursting across the media day after day… (though istis is loath to give more air time to the former member[i] of parliament  for Uxbridge and South Ruislip, perhaps joining others who hope that in the future the no-longer-if-ever right honourable member’s words might only be available behind a paywall: events that we can choose never to attend, books that we need never pick up - and in newspapers that we don't need to buy!  For some that thought may release a mighty "Huzzah!"[ii])

·        what does ‘wilfully’ or ‘recklessly’ look like – and what does contempt sound like? 

·        can we all be bought? do we all have a price? money…, honours…, policies and principles altered for electoral success…?

·        The Labour Party’s apparent ‘retreat from… £28bn annual commitment on green investment’[iii]

·        the purpose of the House of Lords: an unelected over-bloated chamber, sprinkled lightly with clerics[iv]

·        whether protest including slow walking[v], is a right

·        safeguarding (again) - as we wait to see whether there will be a sole survivor of a particular church’s leadership team[vi] and whether a Chief Scout will be grylled (sic) on the issue of compensation in abuse cases[vii]  

·        finally, the start of the UK Covid 19 pandemic inquiry with key issues this week including: the voices and representation of the bereaved, national preparedness, the potential eye-off-the-ball impact of ‘Brexit’[viii]

·        the 6th anniversary of the Grenfell Tower fire and terrible, terrible tragedy[ix] 

·        the future of local radio[x]   

·        ‘synthetic’ human embryo created without sperm or egg?[xi]

·        social media and ‘t’interweb’ perusal and procrastination (nothing new there!)

And istis notes that many of the above seem to be connected somehow…

Yet, in what may be a search in vain for something a little different istis re-ponders music [xii] in the hope of a little light relief this weekending. This was partly prompted during one of those very social media distractions where someone asked a version of this question: If you can't listen to music ever again for $1,000,000 would you say yes or no?[xiii]

Well, for istis, music in one form or other is pretty much a constant and vital:

·        remembering fondly a Grandad who seemed always to be humming and/or playing ‘air piano’ and for whom the first notes on an instrument borrowed from school were attempted during a last hospital visit many years’ ago

·        now being a grandad who probably seems always to be humming, singing or whistling

·        the ever-welcome new edition of ‘Songlines’ magazine[xiv] which dropped this week

·        a new earworm tune found, practised, recorded and shared with friends (with thanks to Helen Bell for ‘Leaving Whitby in a newly acquired folk book[xv])

·        waiting for a new album to be available[xvi]

·        John Lennon’s voice ‘AI-d’ to sing again with Paul McCartney[xvii]

·        learning a new community choir song: Brazilian, fado-esque (oh, it’s much sadder than that!), literally heart-breaking, if the words are to be believed

·        getting an air-play on local radio of a recently triumphant football team’s signature song and recalling a school detention for once singing that self-same song far too loudly in the changing room after PE; I thank you!

So for istis, while the $1million would be fantastic for all sorts of reasons (including thinking how to benefit others with strategic substantial drops in various buckets), I think that the answer to the offer of ‘no music but a £1m’ would be a firm ‘no’ - though voiced in the style of a sad lament

©istis                                                                                                                    

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog entries to be found on Twitter: replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders. Twitter ‘follows’ and respectful comment and dialogue welcome...  



[ii] As ‽istis types this it is rumoured that the erstwhile PM may be a new columnist for the Daily Mail newspaper… as noted a newspaper now with a further reason that many may not buy it.

[ix] https://www.london.gov.uk/media-centre/mayors-press-release/mayors-statement-on-the-sixth-anniversary-of-the-grenfell-tower-fire The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: “The Grenfell Tower fire was a devastating tragedy and its impact was felt across our nation. On this sixth anniversary we pause to remember the 72 lives tragically cut short and pay tribute to the bereaved, survivors and community of North Kensington, standing in full solidarity with all those impacted. We owe it to them to do everything we can to secure justice and ensure the failings that led to this disaster can never be repeated.

 “Justice delayed is justice denied and, six years on we should be operating in a different world –one in which fire safety is prioritised and embedded, rules and regulations are ambitious and rigorous, guidance is clear and comprehensive, and the industry is responsible and highly-skilled.”


Friday 9 June 2023

Pistis ponders values and AI (weekending June 10th 2023)

 

istis ponders values across generations and wonders whether wisdom can be artificial (weekending June 10th 2023)

Two threads have been weaving around for istis this past week:

·        Generation matters: the ‘BCW Movatory’ – ‘Age of Values Report’ is published[i] with its motivation set out transparently: ‘If we speak to people’s values, we can move them, whether that be to purchase, to advocate, to embark on a treatment pathway, or to vote.’[ii]   Apparently members of ‘Generation Z’, born between 1997 and 2012 and the largest generation in the world, ‘are evidently clear-eyed in their desire for power, achievement, hedonism and stimulation’[iii]

·        Artificial Intelligence: suddenly ‘AI’ is all over the news with voices of alarm sounding (for perhaps yet again, the end of the world is nigh)[iv], calls for regulation (another attempt to carry on ruling, controlling or beating the world by the UK?)[v], a new headset launched with which to see and hear and experience – blending virtual and reality for a life augmented[vi], at quite a cost.

And this is what istis has mainly wondered:

·        is intelligence the same as wisdom? can ‘Artificial Intelligence’ be artificially ‘wise’? should/could/might we be seeking to develop ‘AW’ (Artificial Wisdom) programmes and applications and are we smart enough to know the difference?

 

·        if there are discernible shared values that can be said to be embraced and articulated in word and deed by large swathes of people who happen to be born within a defined set of years - then what could be the values that might right now be built-in, driving and guiding both the development of 'AI’ and also its application and operation? Whose values and what are they?

Are these legitimate questions to ask? Does it even work like that? istis may be doing little more than demonstrating an incomplete grasp of the issues involved – which may be part of the problem if istis is representative of most of us…

And then, furthermore, what values might be built-in, driving and guiding any regulation (located in the UK, or elsewhere) that seems likely to follow in the wake of technological progression?

If ‘AI’ programmes can draw on information and knowledge from a vast mass of sources (all digitised knowledge?) and can synthesise and come up with solutions to many of our most pressing problems, then whose interests might those solutions serve?

If AI/AW recommended solutions to some of the day’s political and social challenges are ones that are considered best for humanity as a whole (in some sort of Benthamite utilitarian-type calculation of the greatest good for the greatest number[vii]) then who might win out and who might lose? How will the richest 50 families in the UK who, we learned this week, hold ‘more wealth than half of the UK population, comprising 33.5 million people’[viii] fare, for example? …even if they are well-represented on any AI regulatory board (as owners of the means of production and owners of the means of provision are perhaps likely to be?)

What if AI/AW recommended solutions to some of the day’s political and social challenges followed a value position such as: ‘from each according to their ability, to each according to their need’[ix]

What if AI/AW recommended solutions to some of the day’s political and social challenges (emerging from almost unimaginable calculatory and synthesising capacity) were to enact the ‘Golden Rule’ as a foundation for behaviour?

Will the development of ‘AI’, its application and operation, and its potential regulation be driven by ‘Visionaries’, ‘Protectors’, ‘Traditionalists’, ‘Success Seekers’, ‘Adventurers’, ‘Good Neighbours’ or ‘Conformists’? Which of these seven proposed ‘values archetypes’, singly or in some combination, might develop, operate, apply and control an ‘AI’ future?[x]

…All for much greater ponderance and wondering and from minds more informed, intelligent and wise than istis'…

 

But, reading the  ‘Age of Values Report’ this week, has prompted istis to look at Shalom Schwartz’s ‘Theory of Basic Human Values’[xi] - the ideas that provided the overarching conceptual framework for the generational values’ study and report.  

Scwartz’s theory/model/approach/research tool…  ‘specifies a set of ten value orientations that are probably comprehensive of the major different orientations that are recognized across cultures.’ (see paper on ref xi)

·        POWER: Social status and prestige, control or dominance over people and resources. (social power, authority, wealth, preserving my public image)

·        ACHIEVEMENT: Personal success through demonstrating competence according to social standards. (successful, capable, ambitious, influential)

·        HEDONISM: Pleasure and sensuous gratification for oneself. (pleasure, enjoying life, self-indulgence)

·        STIMULATION: Excitement, novelty, and challenge in life. (daring, a varied life, an exciting life)

·        SELF-DIRECTION: Independent thought and action-choosing, creating, exploring. (creativity, freedom, independent, curious, choosing own goals)

·        UNIVERSALISM: Understanding, appreciation, tolerance and protection for the welfare of all people and for nature. (broadminded, wisdom, social justice, equality, a world at peace, a world of beauty, unity with nature, protecting the environment)

·        BENEVOLENCE: Preservation and enhancement of the welfare of people with whom one is in frequent personal contact. (helpful, honest, forgiving, loyal, responsible)

·        TRADITION: Respect, commitment and acceptance of the customs and ideas that traditional culture or religion provide the self. (humble, accepting my portion in life, devout, respect for tradition, moderate)

·        CONFORMITY: Restraint of actions, inclinations, and impulses likely to upset or harm others and violate social expectations or norms. (politeness, obedient, self-discipline, honoring parents and elders)

·        SECURITY: Safety, harmony and stability of society, of relationships, and of self. (family security, national security, social order, clean, reciprocation of favors)

So, how are you and I orientated – individually or together?

What do you and I value – individually or together?

And again, what is valued by those who have power and influence now (really, virtually, ‘augmentally’) and who may be driving, building-in and guiding or controlling the development of ‘AI’ and its application, operation and regulation?

The future of current and future generations, whatsoever they may be called[xii], perhaps, possibly, may depend on the answer to this question…

©istis                                                                                                                    

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog entries to be found on Twitter: replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders. ‘Follows’ and respectful comment and dialogue welcome...  

 

 



[i] https://bcwmovatory.com/bcw-age-of-values-2023-report/: ‘Our values are foundational; they shape

our identities, determine what is important  to us and impact how we engage with the  world and those communicating with us.  They are more constant than attitudes, opinion, knowledge, or emotion; because  once consolidated in adolescence, they tend  to remain stable throughout our adult lives. They not only explain past behaviors but can also predict how we will behave in the future.

‘Values are also everywhere, permeating culture and politics as never before. Whether it’s brand values, corporate values, cultural values, or our own personal values, they dominate our conversations and define our arguments.   So, we wanted to understand more since we are in the “Age of Values”; who holds

which values and where, and how they shape people’s interests, concerns, and behaviors.’

[iv] Joe Biden, 8.6.2023: Biden said. "I met in the Oval Office with eight leading scientists in the area of AI. Some are very worried that AI can actually overtake human thinking and planning. So we've got a lot to deal with. An incredible opportunity, but a lot do deal with." https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/06/01/president-biden-warns-ai-could-overtake-human-thinking/70277907007/

[v] ‘Barely a week goes by without AI experts issuing catastrophic warnings about the technology’s potential impacts, and even AI companies themselves have expressed a desire for regulation.’

In: ‘Rishi Sunak wants to lead the world on AI. The world ain’t listening’ by  Laurie Clarke, Annabelle Dickson And Cristina Gallardo in ‘Politico’: https://www.politico.eu/article/rishi-sunak-ai-technology-wants-to-lead-the-world-on-ai-the-world-aint-listening/

[x] From the BCW Motavatory report:    ‘Using our research data and working with our expert partners, we have established that we all belong to one of seven Values ArchetypesTM. Each has a distinct values profile, and therefore different life philosophies and communications imperatives for how to engage them. The archetypes range from ‘The Visionary’, who values personal freedom and creativity, to ‘The Protector’, who prioritizes people and the planet, to ‘The Traditionalist’, who focuses on safety, stability, and harmony. Our analysis busts the myth that Gen Z is one uniform group. Instead, it dominates the four other archetypes: ‘The Success Seeker’, who is driven by a desire for power and personal achievement; ‘The Adventurer’, someone who seeks stimulation and new experiences, ‘The Good Neighbor’, who places great importance on the welfare of friends, family, and the environment, and ‘The Conformist’, who wants to fit in and avoid confrontation.’ https://bcwmovatory.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/BCW-Movatory-Age-of-Values-2023.pdf

[xii] Greatest Generation: Born 1901-1924 / Silent Generation: Born 1925-1945 / Baby Boomers: Born 1946-1964 / Generation X: Born 1965-1980 / Millennials: Born 1981-1996 / Generation Z: Born 1997-2012 / Generation Alpha: Born 2013-2025… From: https://journeymatters.ai/7-generations/ ‘Journey Matters’ which, interestingly is ‘a visual learning community for multifamily marketing leaders.’


‽istis ponders volunteering, expertise and tapping (weekending April 27th 2024)

  ‽istis ponders volunteering, expertise and knowing where and how to tap (weekending April 27 th  2024) Various themes this weekending; m...