Saturday 31 July 2021

Pistis feels the heat (weekending July 31st 2021)

 

‽istis feels the heat… (weekending July 31st 2021)

In a week when the work of the UK’s Climate Change Committee[i] leads to headlines that cut through alongside:

·        the 2020 (sic) Olympics,

·        empty supermarket shelves,

·        Covid-19 latest stats (but perhaps, sadly, not necessarily the stories behind those figures - of the people and families and health and social care professionals, researchers and essential keyworkers who continue to work so hard for us all)

·        the apparent boost to the RNLI’s (Royal National Lifeboat Institution) income[ii] following comments by a past politician/more recent TV presenter (who has perhaps alighted on the possibly sinking ship of a fledgling TV News channel)

…‽istis feels the heat.

Exploring the website and published reports of the Climate Change Committee (the UK’s adviser on tackling climate change - an independent, statutory body established under the Climate Change Act 2008, whose ‘…purpose is to advise the UK and devolved governments on emissions targets and to report to Parliament on progress made in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and preparing for and adapting to the impacts of climate change’) ‽istis has been absorbed in the research, shocked anew by the findings and deeply, deeply troubled by what on earth seems to be happening!

‽ the Research to review and update indicators of climate-related risks and actions in England [iii] focuses on 9 indicators of climate-related risk and an assessment of related actions, that may be of benefit to the built environment, infrastructure, the natural environment, people and health, business. In classic risk assessment style, it sets out i) the ‘state of the art’: trends in risk factors (hazard, vulnerability and exposure) and, ii) mitigation: trends in adaptation action (input and output) and impacts. And the reader is taken into the world behind the headlines: the rate of development of properties in areas at risk of flooding; the area of impermeable surface in urban areas; the area under vine and the volume of wines produced; the change in the total hedgerow length, etc…  and the devil seems to lurk in the detail!

‽ and then there’s the Independent Assessment of UK Climate Risk[iv] setting out the priority climate change risks and opportunities for the UK and the linked website: www.ukclimaterisk.org hosts all the resource material. And what stood out for ‽istis?:

·        the identification of more than 60 areas of risk and opportunity relating to the natural environment, health, homes, infrastructure upon which we rely, the economy (that’s pretty much the fundamentals of life?)

·        that the gap between the level of risk we face and the level of adaptation underway has widened – that the adaptation action has failed to keep pace with the worsening reality of climate risk (that’s pretty much the two sides of a failing risk assessment and management process?)

·        the UK has the capacity and resources to respond effectively but it has not done so yet (we could, but we haven’t)

·        action now will be cheaper than waiting to deal with the consequences; the Government must lead that action (it will only cost more the longer we leave it)

·        urgent attention is needed in the next two years in relation to 8 risk areas – and they seem worth citing in full as they are potentially so fundamental to the wellbeing and security of us all:

§  risks to the viability and diversity of terrestrial and freshwater habitats and species - from multiple hazards

§  risks to soil health - from increased flooding

§  risks to natural carbon stores and sequestration - from multiple hazards - leading to increased emissions

§  risks to crops, livestock and commercial trees - from multiple hazards

§  risks to supply of food, goods and vital services due to climate-related collapse of supply chains and distribution networks

§  risks to people and the economy - from climate-related failure of the power system

§  risks to human health, wellbeing and productivity - from increased exposure to heat in homes and other buildings

§  multiple risks to the UK - from climate change impacts overseas

Multiple hazards. Risks to supply of food, goods and vital supplies with the collapse of supply chains and distribution networks.  Risks to human health and wellbeing. Two years. Urgent attention. Adaptation action has failed to keep pace with the worsening reality of climate risk. ‘We can act to help manage these risks but we must act now.’

And for those of us who may only have 3’17” of time or attention and like information in animated, picture form (say at a Cabinet meeting?), well there’s a film that spells it out https://youtu.be/EOW4fG-qlWUhttps://youtu.be/EOW4fG-qlWU

And so, ‽istis wonders whether:

‽ pondering on is perhaps something of a luxury

‽ putting off a decision to act now is possibly indeed to make a decision

‽ whilst there may be an important link between a clear understanding of the problem and its causes (problem locus) e.g: human made or not (and again there is the danger of putting off action while the debate rumbles on - if only on the airwaves of the BBC seeking to line up a binary balance on an uneven seesaw of evidence, perhaps - is indeed a decision) and solution focus - many solutions are proposed and perhaps could help, whatever the cause; 

‽ attempts to apportion responsibility and blame may simply distract

‽ science and tech solutions, geo-engineering (e.g: the scaling up of carbon extraction technology) may save us (and the thank-goodness-for-the vaccine-as-Messiah response to Covid-19 has potentially strengthened this view?) but can we be sure…? and what if they can’t? and what if it is too late by the time we find out the answer to those questions…?

‽ the turning point perhaps only comes when minds meet hearts (this is affecting me and mine, here and now); when profits meet losses; when it is more expensive not to act; when the danger is clear and present; when we cannot not

But again, what happens when perhaps we realise all that too late?

In risk assessment it is probably worth remembering that low probability events nevertheless sometime happen; is it worth a gamble? As the weight of evidence mounts, then to forget that high probability events are likely to happen is perhaps, possibly, maybe beyond reckless…   

Multiple hazards. Risks to supply of food, goods and vital supplies with the collapse of supply chains and distribution networks.  Risks to human health and wellbeing. Two years. Urgent attention. Adaptation action has failed to keep pace with the worsening reality of climate risk. ‘We can act to help manage these risks but we must act now.’ Independent Assessment of UK Climate Risk

But if we believe that where there is a will, there is a way - then what else might be different for us, for our children, for this ‘Pale Blue Dot’ imagined by Carl Sagan[v] and seen in recent weeks from, perhaps, a new perspective by Branson and Bezos (floating momentarily on the profits of a host of other people's work):

‘That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.’

© Pistis                                                                                                                        

NB: further reflections and comments linked to this week’s theme and past blog
entries to be found on Twitter: replies, retweets (which don’t necessarily indicate approval, sometimes the very opposite!) and ‘likes’: @Pistis_wonders 
 


[i] https://www.theccc.org.uk/

[ii] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/29/rnli-donations-soar-in-response-to-farages-migrant-criticism

 [iii] https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/research-to-review-and-update-indicators-of-climate-related-risks-and-actions-in-england-adas/ Published June 2021

[iv] Independent Assessment of UK Climate Risk - Climate Change Committee (theccc.org.uk)

[v] https://www.dailygood.org/pdf/ij.php?tid=682

 

‽istis ponders a pause (weekending July 27th 2024)

  ‽istis ponders a pause (weekending July 27 th 2024) This weekending ‽istis is pondering a pause, after 5 years of weekly posts (aside f...